Information and techniques
To research stereotypes out of subgroups of females and you will males, we first held a pilot analysis in order to accumulate a listing of latest intercourse subgroups in Norwegian community.
Pilot Study
Participants (N = 60) was indeed contacted in public places around center out of Bergen, Norway, and questioned to take part in an initial questionnaire on which organizations they experience that ladies and you may guys inside the community is split into. One of the players, 50.0% was women. An excellent forty-eight.3% was indeed guys (that new member don’t answer comprehensively the question throughout the gender/sex dos ) and also the imply many years is actually (SD = , range 18–79). Most (90.0%) didn’t have a keen immigrant background. The remainder got possibly immigrated by themselves (six.7%) or were Norwegian created to 1 or a couple of immigrant parents (step one.7%). One participant didn’t answer the background matter.
Brand new knowledge to the people is once the: ‘There are many “types” of women in today’s area. Please jot down as much different kinds of women (e.g., parents off young kids, businesswomen) as you are able to think of.’ All of those other web page are remaining empty for the participant to write into the. On the another page, a similar instruction discussing types of men try exhibited. The transaction out of speech are counterbalanced to ensure that half of the players detailed girls very first, others 50 % of listed boys very first.
Normally, the participants indexed 7.twenty eight different types of lady (SD = cuatro.07, diversity 0–21) and you will seven.42 different types of men (SD = 4.47, assortment 0–24). Around three criteria instabang were useful to determine which organizations is chose since stimulus teams in the primary investigation: (a) the group needed to be stated by the at least four users, (b) we tried having organizations out-of additional personal roles and you will categories (elizabeth.g., communities defined of the family unit members and you may elite roles and intimate orientations), and (c) i wished to make sure that we’d parallel men and women subgroups (elizabeth.grams., male political leaders and you will lady political leaders, unmarried moms and dads, and solitary dads) to help you facilitate evaluations of individuals occupying a comparable personal part and group. Our choice you to definitely a communities should be mentioned by four players is advised because of the past had written works (e.grams., Lee and you can Fiske, 2006; En et al., 2013) however, has also been pragmatic in the sense you to definitely a stricter traditional would reduce number of communities provided and a far more easy one would encompass way too many communities are ranked.
Considering these types of standards, 19 male subgroups (business men, dads away from little ones, police- and firemen, bachelors, rich guys, really works males, softer males, men people, outdoorsy males, solitary fathers, convenient males, single guys, male frontrunners, old men, gay males, male academics, stylish men, men people in politics, and you can rockers) and you will twenty-two subgroups of females (solitary mothers, ladies politicians, occupation girls, moms and dads off little ones, nurses, feminists, people college students, outdoorsy girls, teachers (the female variety of the definition of when you look at the Norwegian was utilized), lesbians, old people, blog writers, solitary females, immigrant females, manly women, girls, ladies artisans, get it done girls, ladies teachers, manner ladies, housewives, and you will women leaders) were chosen.
Opting for groups in part considering its salience about pilot attempt is not instead of threats. Since Fiske mais aussi al. (2002) revealed, both groups eliciting antipathy and also in-teams could be less inclined to come. We recognize that the a number of communities is bound in lots of ways: Such as, the list cannot incorporate a complete variety of sexual orientations (elizabeth.grams., bisexual men or women try omitted, heterosexuality wasn’t stated throughout the pilot and presumably removed for granted), and you can “immigrants” were utilized rather than specifying certain ethnicities or nations of origin. We are really not suggesting that our number was representative of your own subgroups that women and you can men can get belong to. Yet not, this new teams picked try salient on Norwegian perspective, and lots of of the included intercourse subgroups have been known inside the earlier look in other federal contexts (Athenstaedt mais aussi al., 2008).